Americans Will Not Accept a "Patsy Defendant" Solution to Charlie Kirk's Gruesome Assassination

By: Donald V. Watkins

Copyrighted and Published on September 12, 2025

FBI Director Kash Patel (left) and DHS Anti-Terrorism Chief Thomas C. Fugate.

An Editorial Opinion

Any murder investigation that begins with the goal of clearing political friends and allies on the front-end to conform to a scripted narrative of events will only produce a "patsy defendant" for public vilification and prosecution. 

We can see from recent developments in Charlie Kirk's assassination investigation that FBI Director Kash Patel and Department of Homeland Security Anti-Terrorism Chief Thomas C. Fugate are headed in that direction.

We have seen the "patsy defendant" solution in the criminal investigation of other assassinations involving high-profile individuals/victims. Here are a few examples of this solution:

President Lyndon B. Johnson made Lee Harvey Oswald the "patsy defendant" in the 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy.  Johnson appointed the Warren Commission to investigate the assassination. The Commission found that Oswald acted alone. Today, most open-minded Americans realize this Commission finding is false and misleading.

Longtime FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover made Muhammad Aziz and Khalil Islam "patsy defendants" in the 1965 assassination of Malcolm X.  Both men were convicted of Malcolm X’s murder. In 2021, both men were exonerated after a judge found evidence of wrongful convictions, including exculpatory evidence that was deliberately withheld from the defense team by the prosecution team, FBI, and New York Police Department.

Hoover repeated the "patsy defendant" solution in the 1968 assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., when the FBI arrested James Earl Ray and claimed Ray was the lone gunman. Today, most open-minded Americans realize Ray did not act alone. What is more, the forensic evidence on the gun supposedly used in the King assassination suggests that Ray may not have been the shooter at all.

Charlie Kirk's Assassination was Not a "Lone Wolf" Operation

At least four people were involved in Charlie Kirk's assassination -- a computer hacker who accessed logistical information regarding Kirk's security arrangements from various third-party electronic accounts, the shooter, a spotter near the stage, and a get-away accomplice.

The American pubic will not accept any political and/or law enforcement coverup in Charlie Kirk’s assassination case.  Kirk's murder was not a “lone wolf” operation.

As concerned members of the public, we want the entire team of assassins apprehended, charged, tried, convicted, and executed, including all members of the foreign intelligence agency team that may have organized and orchestrated Charlie Kirk’s assassination.  We do not believe in "diplomatic immunity" for an assassination carried out by a foreign government on U.S. soil.

Furthermore, we must show the world that any foreign government that participated in Charlie Kirk's assassination is America’s enemy. Campaign contributions to favored politicians, direct or laundered payments to certain well-known social media influencers, and/or offers to arrange financing for private business deals for key U.S. government officials must NEVER be allowed to buy forgiveness for a foreign government’s involvement in a political assassination on U.S. soil.

Finally, we must listen to Charlie Kirk explain Jeffrey Epstein's connection to Mossad (Israel's national intelligence agency) and Mossad's blackmail of powerful individuals in the U.S. In the 2-minute video shown below, Kirk provides a key clue to the events leading up to his assassination. [Click here to watch the video].