top of page
  • Writer's pictureDonald V. Watkins

Did Bradley Arant Boult Cummings Ripoff Encompass Health for Over $100 Million?

Updated: Aug 17, 2023

By: Donald V. Watkins

Copyrighted and Published on May 27, 2023

IMAGE: Former HealthSouth CEO Richard M. Scrushy.

An Editorial Opinion

Former HealthSouth CEO Richard Scrushy was in the news this past week. HealthSouth Corp., now known as Encompass Health, was back in a Birmingham, Alabama state court, once again, to collect money on a $2.9 billion civil judgment that was entered against Scrushy in the aftermath of the infamous HealthSouth accounting fraud scandal.

In 2005, Scrushy was acquitted on all criminal charges in a companion criminal case. However, the civil judgment was entered against Scrushy at the conclusion of a shareholder derivative lawsuit four years later.

Last week, lawyers for Encompass went to court to chase down a rumor that Scrushy had control over a prisoner’s multimillion bank account. Scrushy denied this claim.

Encompass is represented in the post-judgment collection proceedings by the Birmingham-based law firm of Bradley Arant Boult Cummings, LLP (“Bradley”).

After the civil judgment was rendered in 2009, the law firms of Hare, Wynn, Newell and Newton, LLP, and Bradley were able to quickly collect about $33 million from their post-judgment collection legal activities. No money has been collected from Scrushy in the last 10 years.

Encompass has paid Bradley over $100 million for its legal work in the case. As a result, the law firm has gotten rich from this case.

Since 2009, the legal work in the case has focused on debt collection activities.

Former Bradley Partners Enriched Their Old Law Firm

Since 2009, two former Bradley partners have served as general counsel of HealthSouth/Encompass. The first one is John P. Whittington, who was general counsel from 2006 to 2016.

IMAGE: John P. Whittington, HealthSouth General Counsel from 2006 to 2015.

Patrick Darby succeeded Whittington as Encompass' general counsel in 2016. He, too, was a former Bradley partner.

IMAGE: Patrick Darby, Encompass General Counsel from 2016 to present.

Rather than engaging Bradley's services for debt collection work in Scrushy's case using the standard 15% contingency fee contract, Whittington and Darby chose to reward their old law firm with an open-ended “fee for services” contract that has enriched Bradley by over $100 million.

Bradley is gouging Encompass in the Scrushy case. Despite receiving more than $100 million from Encompass to collect about $33 million, Bradley has not collected one dime of money from Richard Scrushy in the last 10 years.

In recent years, the sole beneficiary of Bradley's debt collection work has been the Bradley law firm itself.

Encompass is a New York Stock Exchange/Fortune 500 company. It's payment of over $100 million in legal fees to Bradley in the Scrushy case has made it possible for the law firm to expand its offices into the Atlanta market -- courtesy of an open-ended gravy train provided by Encompass CEO Mark Tarr, former general counsel John Whittington, and current general counsel Patrick Darby.

The Legal Fees Paid to Bradley Have Been Detrimental to Encompass' Shareholders

The $100 million or more in payments to Bradley for legal fees in Richard Scrushy's case have been detrimental to Encompass' shareholders for several reasons.

First, John W. Haley, the prominent Hare, Wynn, Newell and Newton attorney who won the civil case against Scrushy, reportedly told Bradley attorneys during a post-judgment discovery proceeding, "there is nothing here; we have gotten everything Richard Scrushy had."

Haley also called one of Richard Scrushy’s attorneys and told him that he [Haley] was cutting his losses and that he was convinced that they had gotten all they could get from Scrushy.

Afterwards, Haley resigned from the case. Bradley, riding the wave of an open-ended "fee for services" contract, pressed on.

The individuals who supervised Bradley's unproductive debt collection work and who approved Encompass' payment of Bradley's invoices in Scrushy’s case are John Whittington and Patrick Darby – the two former Bradley partners.

The legal fees paid to Bradley have only served to subsidize the law firm. For over a decade, there has been no direct or indirect benefit to Encompass shareholders from the company's payments to Bradley in Scrushy's case.

Second, the $100 million or more that Encompass has paid to Bradley could have built three Encompass rehabilitation facilities. Each one of these new facilities would have netted Encompass shareholders at least $10 million per year in free cash flow for each facility for a 50-year period.

Third, the $100 million or more paid to Bradley to collect $33 million raises plenty of red flags. Something is amiss here. This matter smells. Furthermore, this Encompass-Bradley payment arrangement warrants an internal review by Encompass's board of directors and an external investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. This is the only way Bradley's gravy train with Encompass will come to an end in the Scrushy case.

Fourth, Bradley’s “fee for services” contract should be terminated immediately and replaced with the standard 15% contingency fee contract for post-judgment discovery and debt collection proceedings.

Fifth, the amount of money Bradley has received from Encompass beyond the 15% standard fee on the $33 million that was collected over a decade ago should be clawed back from Bradley, John Whittington, and Patrick Daniel, via a shareholder derivative lawsuit.


As it stands today, Encompass has rewarded Bradley with over $100 million in shareholders' money for what some legal observers have characterized as "routine" debt collection proceedings that are normally provided on a 15% contingency fee basis.

A law firm that cannot find what it believes to be "hidden" money and assets after has been paid more than $100 million to do so is sorely lacking in high quality legal talent, or it is simply ripping off a client like Encompass.

If Bradley truly believes that Richard Scrushy has "hidden" $2.9 billion in wealth somewhere in the world, the law firm should be competent and confident enough to find it on a contingency fee basis.

At some point, Bradley needs to demonstrate its expertise in something beyond sucking more than $100 million in shareholder money out of Encompass in one case.


Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
lekor adams
lekor adams
Feb 08

The allegation of Bradley Arant Boult Cummings ripping off Encompass Health for over $100 million raises concerns about ethical business practices and financial transparency. Amidst legal intricacies, it's important to acknowledge the broader impact on stakeholders, including patients and their families. Companies like MyLifeChoice, focused on providing compassionate medical assistance, become integral in such discussions. While not directly related to the mentioned case, MyLifeChoice highlights the significance of prioritizing genuine patient care. In challenging times, whether legal or health-related, services like grief and bereavement counseling offered by MyLifeChoice underscore the importance of holistic support for individuals facing serious illnesses and their families.


Kamar Jones
Kamar Jones
May 28, 2023

This law firm has found the Golden goose. No one pays fee for services collecting a debt.

Donald V. Watkins
Donald V. Watkins
May 28, 2023
Replying to

Kamar, the only reason corruption of this kind and magnitude is flourishing among New York Stock Exchange/Fortune 500 companies like Encompass Health and the Southern Company is because the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is totally compromised and useless, as is the U.S. Department of Justice. The hotbed for corruption has moved from the halls of government to the corporate suites of Wall Street firms. Nobody is policing this kind of corruption.

bottom of page